Malignant

Horrornews is a discussion forum for true horror fans to discuss the more obscure areas of the horror/cult/exploitation film genre as well as current theatrical horror.

Moderator: Chris Slack

Post Reply
User avatar
Chris Slack
Posts: 5508
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 1999 12:00 pm
Location: Richland, WA USA
Contact:

Malignant

Post by Chris Slack »

James Wan's big "return to horror" was utter dogshit. If they were trying to do an 80's style campy slasher-ish horror film they tried way too hard. Sure, it had some moments of cool cinematography and lighting but everything else was just bad. Horrible acting, super weak story, terrible CG gore, lots of cheap jump scares, and an overly bombastic score. "Malignant" was just dumb. Style over substance can work, but when the style is also crap there is only failure.

As a disclaimer, this opinion comes from a fan of tons of cheap, crappy, horror films from the 60s, 70s, and 80s. What's the difference? The cheap crappy films I am a fan of had heart and were fun. Zombie vs shark in "Zombie?" Dumb as hell, but awesome. "Malignant" made that look like "The Godfather" or something. "Hell of the Living Dead" is high art compared to this for crying out loud.

If you're going to subject yourself to this watch it on Max or pirate it. Don't spend a dime as that will merely motivate them to make this the next "big" franchise.
"Regrettable... I was hoping for a colleague, but at least we have
another experimental subject..." -Mesa of Lost Women
Post Reply